Image courtesy of Colonial National Historical Park, Yorktown.

Friday, March 9, 2012

Meeting Notes: November 16, 2011

"Nathanael Greene's Northern Apprenticeship," Curtis Morgan

Major General Nathanael Greene was the most successful combat commander of the American Revolution. Between December 1780 and December January 1782, a period of just two years, he effectively expelled all British forces from North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia; the British soon abandoned Savannah and Charleston, the premier port cities of the South, because they were no longer able to feed themselves from country districts under patriot control. In the space of seven months Greene fought three major battles (Guilford Courthouse, Hobkirk’s Hill, and Eutaw Springs) and besieged the British backcountry strongpoint at Ninety Six, South Carolina. On each occasion, although unsuccessful in driving British forces from the field of battle, he inflicted such grievous casualties on them that they withdrew from Greene’s vicinity soon afterwards, to refit and regroup. In each instance, Greene was in possession of the original battlefield soon after, and permanently.

Like almost all of America’s battlefield commanders, Greene was self-taught in the art of war. But nothing instructs like experience; and he was not bereft of human teachers. He quickly became an acolyte of General George Washington, whose military skills he would surpass by the war’s end. The essay examines the lessons Greene learned at Washington’s side from the war’s beginning in the summer of 1775 to his appointment to command the disintegrated Southern Army in the fall of 1780. Over five years Greene was a student in America’s very first “war college,” and in the South he would apply what he had learned in several crucial “classes”: leadership of independent-minded troops; conduct of operations against a more experienced, better-led and –equipped enemy; and finally the burdens of logistics.

1) The working relationship between Greene and Gen. George Washington. Greene’s retreat across North Carolina and flight across the Dan in early 1781, and his decision to turn and fight at Guilford Courthouse, were based on his experiences during Washington’s fighting retreat through New Jersey in 1776 and his decision to turn and fight at Trenton and Princeton. Also involved here is Greene’s personal devotion and loyalty to Washington, a trait Washington found very rare in his subordinates.

2) Greene’s management of Army supply and logistics matters. Greene was Washington’s supply chief at Valley Forge, saved the Army logistically and prepared it for its test at Monmouth.

3) Strategy & Tactics. Greene had observed at first hand the utility of a well-conducted withdrawal. The American strategy for the remainder of the war was established: withdraw before superior British forces; look for opportunities to strike the enemy; above all, never forget that the American army was the Revolution. Although useful as supply centers, cities and towns were also traps. They tied armies down, and seduced commanders into ceding the initiative to a more mobile enemy.

Greene’s “northern apprenticeship” had equipped him well to conduct the decisive American campaign of the war: the operations in the Carolinas in 1780-1782. The key to that triumph is the fact that Greene kept his army fed and cavalry foraged, while striving to deny these things to his British opponents. In this he succeeded brilliantly, and saved the American Revolution.

Meeting Notes: September 21, 2011

"Prelude to Yorktown: The Battle of Green Spring," Chris Bryce

Meeting Notes: July 20, 2011

"Holding the Line of Independence: The Maryland Continental Line," Philip Greenwalt

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Meeting Notes: May 25, 2011

"Tarleton and the Myth of Buford's Massacre at the Waxhaws," Jim Piecuch

Our speaker at our May 25th meeting was Jim Piecuch. Jim was born in Manchester, New Hampshire and was a city firefighter there for 13 years. At the same time he was a free lance writer publishing numerous historical articles locally as well as regionally and nationally. He holds a B.A. and Masters in History from the University of New Hampshire. His Ph.D. in history is from the College of William & Mary here in Virginia. He serves as a professor at Kennesaw State University in Georgia.

Jim has four books to his credit listed below, but the book he discussed with us was The Blood Be Upon Your Head, Tarleton, Buford, and the Myth of Massacre. The Southern Campaigns of the American Revolution Press has recently published this. If you did not have a chance to buy it at the meeting it can be ordered at the SCAR website.
Jim’s book is about what happened at the Waxhaws Settlement in South Carolina on 29 May 1780. Historically this has been thought to have been a massacre but Jim’s research has portrayed it to be more of a short lived battle. In a way he suggested that Tarleton was almost a nice, reasonable guy but, of course, we are still free to view him as the enemy. Cornwallis had directed that Buford’s troops be destroyed.

Tarleton’s cavalry, which had covered 105 miles in 54 hours, had caught up with the Continental troops led by Colonel Abraham Buford. Buford was returning to Virginia after being too late to be of help in Charleston. Tarleton had demanded Buford’s surrender but was refused. Both sides had to contend with bad weather and roads of mud.

At the time of the catch up, the battle ensued. According to Piecuch the entire battle consisted of only one volley. Of course, one volley is still deadly and one noted fatality was Tarleton’s own horse and his men initially feared that he was mortally wounded as well. This is when his men set upon the now surrendered Patriots hacking and bayoneting them. This might certainly come under the definition of a massacre, at least, that is how it was used as propaganda in the Patriot cause.

Still the term massacre was not used by the American soldiers in their pension applications but referred to it as Buford’s defeat. Call it what you will, it is still bloody war.
This was a most interesting meeting which resulted in a spirited Q & A session following.

Other books by Jim Piechuc include:

Cool Deliberate Courage: John Eager Howard in the American Revolution This is co-authored by John Beakes. Three Peoples, One King: Loyalists, Indians, and Slaves in the Revolutionary South, 1775-1782

The Battle of Camden: A Documentary History


--Brent Morgan

Meeting Notes: March 16, 2011

"Lafayette: The Idealist General," Marc Leepson

Meeting Notes: January 19, 2011

"Captain John Paul Jones of the Continental Navy," First-Person Presentation by Bill Young

Next Meeting: March 21, 2012

"A Change of Both Men and Measures: British Reaction to Saratoga, 1777-78," Kevin Weddle

The meeting will be held in the Westhampton Room, Heilman Center (dining hall--building 34 on the campus map), University of Richmond, at 6:30 p.m. with dinner available for purchase in the dining hall beginning at 5:30 p.m.

University of Richmond campus map:
http://www.richmond.edu/about/directions/campusmap.pdf